<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Desktop Developer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netsplit.com/2007/09/10/ubuntu-desktop-developer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netsplit.com/2007/09/10/ubuntu-desktop-developer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Jesse</title>
		<link>http://netsplit.com/2007/09/10/ubuntu-desktop-developer/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsplit.com/2007/09/10/ubuntu-desktop-developer/#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad more focus on the desktop is great, but how about a developer for KDE and making Kubuntu rock even better?  I&#039;m not a developer, but would loe to see more work and more paid positions for Kubuntu/KDE work.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad more focus on the desktop is great, but how about a developer for KDE and making Kubuntu rock even better?  I&#8217;m not a developer, but would loe to see more work and more paid positions for Kubuntu/KDE work.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nice</title>
		<link>http://netsplit.com/2007/09/10/ubuntu-desktop-developer/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Nice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsplit.com/2007/09/10/ubuntu-desktop-developer/#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>It is nice to see Canonical is pushing for better desktop! However as 1 out of 1000 coders are good, and only 1 out of 1000 of them really have the ability to think outside the box and understands user interaction, based on the basic laws of probability you have roughly 1 out of 1000000 chance of getting someone that actually fits your job description. That&#039;s a classic mistake done by nearly all nerd companies - not understanding that you need non-coders as coding and the rest of the required skills are counter-inhibitive. They truly commonly are incompatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is nice to see Canonical is pushing for better desktop! However as 1 out of 1000 coders are good, and only 1 out of 1000 of them really have the ability to think outside the box and understands user interaction, based on the basic laws of probability you have roughly 1 out of 1000000 chance of getting someone that actually fits your job description. That&#8217;s a classic mistake done by nearly all nerd companies &#8211; not understanding that you need non-coders as coding and the rest of the required skills are counter-inhibitive. They truly commonly are incompatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

